
There was a team conflict with colleagues about four years
ago, that has taught me to really think through
conflict for a resolution. The conflict was around the matter of everyone
finishing their own assignments and not imposing on others. However, the real matter was having enough
courage to have a crucial conversation.
Because there were four people involved and our supervisor
had to be brought into the matter, we all worked with the Diversity team (HR)
to take layers off of the problem. The
first strategy was the 5 Why’s (because there is a reason for everything). The
example question was “why are people not working their own assignments?” Those
questions then lead to other whys from the string of answers. This strategy uncovered
the intent of the person, not the behavior. The last strategy was making a list
of what we all had in common to remember the mutual goal, that strategy minimized
the conflict and zoomed in more on how we could help each other’s more.
Oh, there was one
more strategy, we took a personality test and shared the results of our personality
type, our greatest strengths and the areas that we struggle with. That strategy
uncovered areas we didn’t notice about ourselves and how others liked to be
treated. Coming up to speed, I can see how
the NVC (in a new perception) played a part ( hearing one’s point of view) and the 3R’s facilitated by the diversity person as
guidelines. .
That's the trouble I have when conflict comes, its trying to find away to bring everyone together to solve the issue and come up with a solution. Did the team learn to work together on their assignments?
ReplyDelete